9 unintended penalties of devolving your PCN budgets

Realizing the way to handle the devolution of your funds with out battle is a danger for many PCNs – listed here are 9 issues to contemplate earlier than you make the leap into apportioning out your finances.

CREDIT: That is an edited model of an article that initially appeared on The Major Care Community

We’re all accustomed to the end-of-year monetary sprint to spend the remaining Further Function Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) monies, as a result of we all know that if we don’t use it, we lose it.

To this point, this mad rush generally manifests as follows:

Paying suppliers prematurely

Bulk commissioning of a brief workforce answer

Attempting to recruit to everlasting or fixed-term positions and not using a clear plan

Devolving the ARRS finances throughout practices

Networks that usually handle their sources at a community degree however then resolve to devolve their finances achieve this with the most effective of intentions to;

Give their practices each flexibility and higher management of the way to utilise the workforce

Maximise the funding alternatives obtainable

Or this occurs fairly frankly, no matter the top of yr sprint, with networks devolving their budgets per record dimension as a result of the community does probably not need to work collectively.


Devolution of funds, significantly that of the ARRS funding, can introduce a degree of danger and a few unanticipated and unwelcome penalties, corresponding to:

Variation in how roles are used

Totally different employment phrases and circumstances which, in flip, result in points with recruitment and retention, and elevated competitors, between practices

Fragmentation of how induction, coaching, help and supervision are performed from apply to apply

An absence of economic governance

An introduction of silo working

Fractional appointments that are exhausting to recruit to for practices with a small record dimension

A danger that DES necessities is not going to be met

It’s exhausting to rewind the choice as soon as it’s been made

A lack of community id and function

All of this leads to battle.

Now this doesn’t apply to each PCN. Many have managed the devolution very well and have prolonged this past the Further Function Reimbursement Scheme, devolving different earnings streams (primarily based on record dimension) again to practices.

Issues to contemplate

Earlier than you make the leap into apportioning out your finances, you might need to think about the next:

Guarantee there’s a Memorandum of Understanding in place between apply/s and PCN

Assessment your community settlement and be certain that any areas of the DES that are subcontracted to particular practices is clearly documented and agreed

Make sure that PCN employment phrases and circumstances are formally agreed at community degree

Create constant job descriptions and work plans

Create a set of frequent requirements in terms of induction

You have to be crystal clear on the reimbursement price

Affirm and agree on the allocation (and achievement) of the funding and influence indicators – and the way this pertains to particular person apply efficiency

Doc and deal with any ‘reside’ governance points or gaps to make sure you can stay true to your community imaginative and prescient.

In brief, allocate time to evaluate your present governance preparations, and the rules you might be working to, to make sure there may be consistency and readability throughout the board.

Devolution can work, however think twice concerning the imaginative and prescient on your community, as one enormous unintended consequence of devolving your Major Care Community finances might be the undoing of working collaboratively and dealing at scale.